WebSakshi vs Union Of India on 26 May, 2004. 11. Ms. Meenakshi Arora, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that Indian Penal Code has to be interpreted in the light of the … WebIn the 172nd Law Commission report, on a request made by the Supreme Court of India in Sakshi v. Union of India[23] and after taking into consideration the issues raised by the petitioner NGO, it was held that a minor girl who has been sexually assaulted, should not be required to give his or her evidence in presence of the accused.
State of Punjab vs. Gurmit Singh and Ors. - Law Times Journal
WebAsp Associates. May 2024 - Jun 20242 months. New Delhi Area, India. Worked on research projects, residential layouts, commercial interior design ,hospitality interior design and 3D Rendering. WebJul 2, 2024 · Union of India demanding the criminalization of marital rape. A marital rape victim has also joined the petition as an intervener. The petitions before Delhi High Court challenge Exception 2 to Section 375 of Indian Penal Code (IPC) which says that sexual intercourse or sexual acts by a man with his own wife, the wife not being under 15 years … spotted lanternfly pictures sheet
Supreme Court turns down plea seeking directions on registration of …
WebHer ability to concisely articulate, and apply data models to unearth nuances and insights from the market data, enables her to distinguish from other data analysts. This was complimented by her collaborative approach and affable personality, which enabled her in engaging with the wider team. Sakshi will be an asset to any team and organisation. WebJul 6, 2024 · Sakshi v. Union of India, AIR 2004 SC 3566 July 06, 2024 Sakshi v. ... Herein the Court also took note of State of Maharashtra v. Dr. Praful B Desai ( 2003) 4 SCC 601, wherein recording of evidence by way of video conferencing vis-à-vis Section 273 Cr.P.C. was held to be permissible and State of Punjab v. http://notesforfree.com/2024/03/09/chinubhai-v-state-bombay-interpretation-statutes/ spotted lanternfly pictures stages